Claudia vs Madeline
UPDATE:
Added two polls.
Over at Sigma game I commented on my appraisal of Schiffer vs Stowe both in their prime. I found the commentary that followed ro be interesting.
Vox believes objective beauty is categorisable with reference to the 1-10 scale men use to rate woman. I generally agree but with the corollary that EVERYONE is affected by their own subjective perspectives. Just like everyone sees through a glass darkly with reference to God. Including Vox and me.
For this reason I have for decades stated that the scale is really at best a 1-9. Numbers above 9 tend to be affected by one’s subjective perspectives.
Claudia was never attractive to me. O je ti ely she is beautiful but in all honesty she has always left me cold. Vox rates her a 10 “objectively”. I give her an 8.5 at most.
Subjectively I can tell she is an 8-8.5 but if she came on to me at a party when I was in my mid-20s I doubt I would have bothered to take her home, and if I had it would have been merely been out of either boredom or curiosity to see if my appraisal that she would have been lacklustre in bed was indeed correct. It’s not entirely for science, but you know, research is research.
Here is Claudia at her best.
On the other hand, if I was at a party where Madeline was at the same hypothetical, I would most likely have approached her. And I am perfectly aware Madeline has an irregular face (asymmetry to a degree is attractive to me even if it supposedly detracts from classical beauty standards) and probably on an objective e scale is only a 7, but personally I rated her a 9. And here she is:
Now, as I’m doing this on my phone, irritatingly, the poll button is not an option, but I am curious as to what the readers think.
There are plenty of images of both women on the internet, some without any clothing at all, so feel free to investigate, and then leave a comment as to whom you find personally more attractive.
This very unscientific and statistically almost insignificant research does not in fact have anything to do with rating women, but rather with how men do so.
As a general criteria, feel free to also explain why you find one more attractive than the other.
Yeah I’m with you on this. I think it’s silly to claim that there is some objective standard of beauty that holds true for every man or woman. That’s not to say that there are no fundamental traits of an attractive woman: good skin, hip to waist ratio, regular features, good hair etc. I’ve always thought that Madeline Stowe is a smoke show, very hot 🔥 I love her hair, body and voice. So I vote Madeline. Another thing I love in a woman, slender hands and fingers. Good nails are also a sign of good health. I’ve seen women with nice facial features and figures with hands that had chipped nails or chubby fingers and that turned me off. Also, the hands and the Adams Apple are the best way to spot a tranny. But Andrew Tate wouldn’t be discouraged!
I left a comment on Vox’s post about this. There’s measurable symmetry that’s the basis of classical beauty and then there’s attractiveness. We’ve all know women that weren’t beautiful but had undeniable sex appeal. Some intangible or maybe very tangible quality that causes you to say ‘hell yeah’.
I usually go for blondes and ‘Celtic’ women, but I’ve always thought that Monica Bellucci was the best thing Italy ever produced. I never thought that Claudia was anywhere close to a 10, either. Frankly, very few ‘super models’ ever had any real appeal for me. It’s someone else’s idea of beauty. Now, they’re all trannies or fat. Go figure.