How much Sewage do you want in your Ice Cream?

No, seriously.

Making the case for “bigotry”

Assume you are a lone human that has a giant laser beam with a message that can save humanity from certain catastrophe. Say an impending asteroid collision they can only avoid with the information you can beam to them. But you are 4 light years away and you need to calculate the trajectory to Earth with extreme precision, because if you are out by even a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny, fraction of a degree, you will miss the Earth entirely. How much error would you tolerate in your measurements?

Or as I put it, how much sewage is ok to have in your ice cream?

Most people will say zero.

But most people will not ACT like they say.

The first example, of the laser beam, is fundamentally closer to the issue with theology.

If you assume that there is objective truth, then only one of two possibilities can be true:

1. All the religions of Earth are in error, it’s just a matter of degree.

2. Only one of them can possibly be completely true.

If you assume 1. You will probably be some kind of secularist Zen-Agnostic Hedonist, as I was for most of my life. If you are also innumerate and possibly retarded you might also be an atheist.

If you assume 2. and God being a LOVING God, then, the only religion that objectively makes sense, that has borne the best and most fruit, in the entirety of human history, is only Catholicism; There isn’t even a close contender. Yes the situation is complicated by the fact that what most people think is Catholicism today is in fact a usurped collection of buildings housing Satanists, pedophiles, Freemasons, Homosexuals, Communists and general grifters. In short, all the things that are in perfect opposition to actual Catholicism. The infiltration and absence of a valid Pope was essentially complete in October 1958 when on the 28th day of it, the first of a continuous line of antipopes and non-Catholics usurped the throne of Peter in the Vatican.

Now… given that we have had no Pope for almost 70 years, the only valid clergy left are somewhat in disarray, and broadly speaking are in two camps. These being:

The Sedeprivationists

Who hold an absurd, illogical, nonsensical theory that the impostor non-Catholic, not-validly ordained, squatting illegally in the Vatican are “materially” legitimate even if they are not “formally” actually even Catholic. This nonsensical theory was formulated long ago, but a theologian that it was clear at the time was probably trying to give a polite “out” to those timid clergy, and perhaps even the fake “Pope” Montini, to return to the fold or at least to recognise the usurpers for the impostors they are. It was never valid Canonically, logically, dogmatically, or even with mere common sense and logic. It also flies directly in the face of Canon Law, and numerous Papal Encyclicals and Ex-Cathedrals pronouncements (i.e. infallible concepts as far as Catholics are concerned). This thesis is so absurd that it would allow the current impostor Bob, to say “I repent” and then be “accepted” as the real valid “Pope”. This is basically saying a guy who breaks into your house, kills your whole family, and tries to murder also your extended family, at some point says “Oh, my bad!” and the last surviving cousin and you, go “No worries! All is forgiven! You’re our Dad now!”

I’m not even exaggerating much. The Sedeprivationists will make noises along the lines of “No,no, no, we don’t say that! We say he must…err…say he’s REALLY SORRY first!”

Seriously.

Here is Bishop Sanborn (a valid Bishop though he is) exposing a truly nonsensical nonsense. Listen to the words.

“The Thesis of Gerard de Laurier does not say that Bergolio is a validly elected Pope… The Thesis says that he is validly elected…”

No doubt Sedeprivationists will now try to say the Bishop “misspoke” but no. The Thesis says EXACTLY that. And if his words seem contradictory, confusing, or flat out nonsensical, it’s because they are. Thesis holders, believe that Bergoglio, or the current Bob, IS in fact, according to them, VALIDLY elected.¹ How this is possible since the people “electing” him are at best arch-heretics, and currently almost certainly without any valid orders, so not even clergy of any kind as well as non-Catholics by way of heresy or never actually having been one, is “explained” by the thesis holders in perambulations, pirouettes, mental subterfuge, obfuscation, confusionism and frankly outright illogical nonsense that would make an Bizarro world seem sane and rational. But don’t take my word for it. See here.

The Totalist Sedevacantists

We, people who can do basic logic, instead apply the simple principle of Canon 188 part 4, which simply, and clearly states that:

Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognized by the law itself if a cleric:

4. Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith

That’s it. No declaration required. the law itself and the fact itself convicts the criminal. And once a heretic, you never get to play clergyman to anyone again.

Simple, logical, a child can get it, but not sophists or those too enamoured by their egos, or those who have become too emotionally invested with an error that provided comfort to them at a difficult time, or who were indoctrinated in it for years.

Now, you can agree with 1958 Sedevacantist Catholic like myself or not, but here is the case:

If you DO accept that real Catholicism (i.e. 1958 Sedevacantism of the Totalist persuasion) is the TRUTH. Or at least the closet and best version of the truth to actual perfect truth,² then, anything that deviates from it is to be rejected.

How much sewage in your ice cream?

Now, when it comes to the Sedeprivationists, they are validly elected clergy, make no mistake, but just because you are a validly elected Bishop or priest, does NOT mean you are infallible, or even smart enough to really carry out your duties well. This is a sad but real fact of human existence. Clergy are human and liable to all the weaknesses of all humans. they can be proud, arrogant, mistaken, not very bright, etcetera, etcetera, and it is the DUTY of every Catholic to certainly call out heresy, but also to point out error. Of course, perhaps a little quietly at first, as among friends. But later a bit louder, among your circle of friends, and if that fails then publicly. The Sedeprivationists have been wrong a long time and have helped stagnate progress towards recovering the true Church as a result.

There ARE valid, and well-intentioned priests and Bishops in their fold, but there is also rampant error, and this is a danger to the laity that follows them. So this error now needs to be pointed out. There are others, more polite than I, more reasonable and sensible and sensitive and charitable. And they will and do educate and speak truth in a calm and forthright and clear manner. The Contra-Thesis website is a perfect example of this. And yet, the effeminate targets of it will already complain even THAT effort is too harsh, too rude, not respectful enough to the Sede clergy in general… and to that, I say: Balls!

The Church was infiltrated and damaged greatly because the clergy of the time was too corrupt, weak and timid to stop it. And then because the laity, which was the fighting arm of the Church was cowed and beaten into “obedience” by Satanists posing as priests and bishops.³

I have always stood my ground for whatever I saw as the highest truth even when I was a child, even when I was nowhere near being a Catholic. I cannot claim therefore, I always did this for some grander purpose. My soul was just shaped that way by God in whatever good parts that may be and by my own errors of will-to-power, or whatever else I might suffer from. I know many think it’s pride, but internally, I know well this is not one of the sins I suffer especially from. I know because 40 years of martial arts demonstrated without a doubt to me that I will lower my head without any hesitation to the truth, even if it comes from a child or an idiot, but never to a lie, an injustice, or a fraud, even if it comes from a king.

Today, at age 56, I also have had so many such instances of “me against the world” that I have had enough experience to notice a pattern that is common not just to me, but to all those like me.

• At first everyone says what a rude, barbaric, evil, arrogant, prideful stupid, troglodyte of a toxic male you are. But even then in the minds of some, the thought appears “Wow, what cringy boor! Totally no etiquette or decorum! Disgusting… and yet… if you ignore that a moment (how could you though!?) what he is fighting for is not really… well… wrong, is it?”

• If you carry on, ideologically and religiously swinging your sword atop the hill; relentlessly; taking on all comers; and gradually people see the metaphorical bodies begin to pile up —because ultimately you ARE right, and logic IS a thing, and TRUTH will out, despite your roughshod methods— some of those people that had that silent thought to themselves? They will begin to speak to each other. Still not acknowledging you in public (they may NEVER do so), but amongst each other your ideas begin to percolate.

• Next, a new face more presentable, and often ignoring your existence on purpose, (because so undignified, not productive, not a good look! Optics! Guys! Optics!) will begin to give air to your core arguments. In some cases, especially in more physical endeavours, sometimes like-minded men will actually stand with you against the hordes. And then you suddenly also have an army on your side, along with a larger one of enemies. But the enemies are weak and scatter, the guys standing next to you are like the 300 with Leonidas.

• Eventually your truth, if kept unflinchingly free of infiltration (and there WILL be infiltration, and corruption attempts, and would-be “leaders” (con-men and grifters) trying to hijack the whole thing, be sure of it) your truth will become the new standard everyone suddenly agrees was always obvious and right all along. For the most part, no one will publicly acknowledge you started the whole avalanche to begin with. And luckily, if you are like me, you don’t care very much about it. The truth is more important than who gets the glory.

• This pattern is universal. As long as your premise is based in truth and objectively valid, it will go this way IF you can last the distance. Which can be hours, days, weeks, months, years, or decades. But the pattern holds for anything; be it some scientific discovery, a process or procedure at work, logical analysis, any sort of real justice, and so on.

That said, in person, people who know me will vouch that I am a fairly personable character, that my persona online is nevertheless pretty much the same to the one in person, but the text-only approach inevitably makes it seem harsher (in reality my internal processes make the text version look like milk and honey, but I present well).

So, the point is that by my judgement, I will behave more forgivingly towards an honest ingenue, than a knowing sophist. But regardless, when it comes to clergy, error needs to be stamped out. And respect is earned, not given freely.

I do respect clergy and their choices, but not above their error towards canon law and Divine law, common sense, logic and the intent of the salvation of souls.

So to you, genteel and fragile Catholics, be you deceived laity of the Novus Ordo (you are in error, but unknowing of the details as to why, so you are Catholics), confused, brainwashed (indoctrinated) or not too-bright Sedeprivationist laity or Clergy, I do, at minimum, accept you are Catholic. But if after repeated, detailed, exposition to the facts, you persist in your error, at some point, I for one will no longer consider you Catholic. Because: Errare human est, perseverare, diabolicum.⁴

You will at that point, at best, be an idiot that can cause harm, as per Professor Carlo Cipolla’s fifth law, and as such, you are more dangerous than an evil person actively trying to hurt the Church. Because you are inside the gates and unpredictable in your idiocy. The damage you can cause is illogical and unpredictable, and we are at WAR.

In a physical war, an enemy spy in your trench needs to be shot of course. But harsh as it may seem, so does a complete idiot who is liable to signal flare to overhead enemy bombers your exact position. In fact, the idiot is more dangerous. He will signal to the enemy bombers unpredictably and for no reason, to his own detriment too. Such people and the enemy spies only have one use: to be shields for the sandbags that protect your trench.

On Etiquette

Ever heard the expression Noblesse Oblige?

It’s French from the days of Aristocracy being a thing. And it runs in some people like the blood in their veins and in others no amount of training can install it.

It refers to the fact that a nobleman has certain duties and obligations of chivalry. But some of us who have a bit more “wisdom of serpents” than the “innocence of doves” can make it a double edges sword.

Yes, I will treat you respectfully and with all due etiquette… as long as you DESERVE IT and EARN IT. And the minute you egregiously do NOT DESERVE IT, I will —by the same absolute sense of honour-bound duty tied to Justice (and Divine Justice at that, or as close as my flawed human wretch of a soul can get to it, NOT my personal sense of it)— drag you out of the temple by your hair and kick your screaming ass down the steps of it, and do a Jean Parisot de Valette on you, if not do a St. Luis the IX on you right away.⁵

Why? Because Noblesse Oblige.

And in case you did not know, ALL nobility back in the day was trained for war. Each knight was trained from childhood to fight and lead men into battle. The war on “toxic” masculinity, has been one loooooooong march towards the general feminisation of men. And it is no coincidence that the proponents of the Thesis, even when well-intentioned, tend to be more effeminate, more cerebral in a sophistic way, and that’s not to mention the snakes in sheep’s clothing infesting the fake Novus Ordo “clergy” they are slimier than a blob of snot on a bed of superheated vapour moving close to the speed of light.

A man who truly understand etiquette as it’s meant to be, is the same kind of guy that knows which dessert fork to use in polite company, but will also readily leap across the dining table and stab you in the eye with it seeking your brain-stem if you turn out to be a child molester.

Now, if you are British, you might say a real gentleman would invite the pedophile to the study with a pretence of gifting him a rare book, before dispatching him; perhaps with poisoned Earl Grey tea. And that’s fair enough. Different cultures will have different takes as long as the final result is the same.

But I’m Venetian. The pedo is not making it out of your chair, never mind to the study. The added bonus is that in such circumstances, the Englishman’s wife will be very tempted to meet the Venetian later, in the study, away from gossipy eyes of course; so as not to give the “wrong impression” you know? No matter how practically accurate it might be. Perhaps under the pretence of gifting him a book on manners. Which she would probably be sure to show him just how unladylike a woman could be, if she had not studied it in depth.

All this to say, that while each man has his weaknesses and each one of us is probably an almost irredeemable sinner (but by the Grace of God!) each one of us has also his attributes that can serve our Lord, however imperfectly.

And in my case, that is generally not a “quietly into the night” kind of way. At least… not as far as the public can see.

The Trannification of potential young Crusaders

There has been an ENORMOUS amount of energy and money spent on creating all sorts of gatekeepers to real catholicism. Here is just a few of the disgusting grifters. But the point is that they do this because guess what happens if you suddenly wake up and realise… “Wait a minute…”

• Violence has always solved ALL of humanity’s problems. For good or ill, it always comes to push, shove, stab, shoot, and kill, kill, kill.

• Catholicism has been totally subverted… but why, so you go look and realise:

  • It’s the ONLY religion that has ALWAYS called out the Talmudians.

  • Look at WHO funds the globotrannification of the planet.

  • Look at WHO creates money out of thin air that they then “lend” to you at interest and that you also pay “taxes” on.

  • Look up and find out what is, and who owns the Bank of International Settlement

  • Look up who you are not allowed to criticise and who you can end up in jail for merely questioning some supposed historical facts about.

  • Look up who the leaders of the Bolsheviks were and how many Christians they intentionally killed.

  • Look up who owns most of the mass media and ask yourself why there is not a word about what a certain country does with respect to genociding a certain other country.

  • Catholicism also outlawed usury.

• And… oh… Catholic Warriors were… ABSOLUTELY FUCKING AMAZING! No, really, they were UNBELIEVABLY AWESOME.

Yeah, if you do all that, you might ask yourself… “Wait… is there a Crusade I can join?”

And yes. Yes there is. And it is forming. Just keep your eyes on this blog. It will happen in the next few weeks that there will be a site, with various sections. And you just need to become part of it. You only need to be a 1958 Sede Catholic of the Totalist position, or at least interested enough in finding out more. Kind of like Starship Troopers: Would you like to know more? Well, soon, there will be a place you can click to, to find out more.

Also, if you did get to the end of this long post: Well done, you’re the kind of relentless autist we want. Get ready.

1. They say he is only MATERIALLY validly elected (by Satanists apparently) but not FORMALLY which is a distinction that has never existed in the entire history of the Church, that would require you to know the true heart of a man (internal forum) which it is a dogmatic principle of Catholicism only God can know, and you would need to ignore all the public displays of heresy and Canon Law 188 part 4 in toto. By their logic, a Priest could start sacrificing babies on the altar and drink their blood but would still remain Catholic enough to vote in a Papal election or possibly even become Pope. You know, after he says “sorry”. Going TOTALLY against the infallible ex-cathedra pronouncement of Pope Paul IV in his Papal Bull Cum Ex Apostolato Officio that clearly states that once a clergyman has become a heretic, even if he should truly repent, he will hold no office, no authority, and no services for ANYONE ever again, but will instead spend the rest of his days in a monastery in perpetual penance without ever performing the sacraments to anyone.

2. As a Catholic we accept Catholicism is infallible and perfect in its divine dogmas despite the fact no human is infallible (including Popes). This is because we believe Jesus said he will be with us to the end, and as such, the Church itself, as small as it might become (a remnant) will remain infallible. And after all there have always been heretics from the start, and there always will be, yet, the Church has survived through the roman emperor persecutions, the Arian heresy, the Western Schism, the time of some 70 years when there were up to three “Popes” and no one was sure who the two fake ones were. And on, and on, and on, yet… the dogma of the Church has remained invariant. No other institution has lasted that long. Oh and we also pot the Bible together, just so you know.

3. The destruction of the royal houses of Europe was a long-term plan started by the Illuminati since 1776 and with the creation of the first Freemason ruled and ideologically formed nation: the USA. The reason for demolishing all royalty was because since the time of Charlemagne, the nobility was always seen as the fighting and protecting arm of the Church. The leadership was clerical, but the fighting men were nobles. Destroying nobility was the first necessary step to infiltrate and corrupt the Church. Without men willing to burn heretics, impostors and Satanists at the stake in the public square, these criminals could act with more liberty and impunity. And in the next 250 years or so, they did.

4. To err is human. To persevere (in the error) diabolical.

5. JPdV spent 4 months in a medieval dungeon-hole for nearly beating a man to death for blasphemy. As for King (later made Saint) Louis IX, in 1240, under his reign, the famous Disputation of Paris was convened. Nicholas Donin, a Jewish convert to Catholicism and Franciscan friar, brought forward 35 charges against the Talmud, demonstrating its blasphemous statements about Our Lord, Our Lady, and Christianity. Among the texts presented were passages depicting “Yeshu” (Jesus) boiling in excrement for eternity, obscene folklore about Adam and Noah, and rabbinical permissions to deceive Christians. Four of the most eminent rabbis of France were summoned to defend these writings.

The disputation concluded with judgment against the Talmud. In 1242, twenty-four wagonloads of manuscripts were burned in Paris, a monumental act in a pre-printing age, perhaps 10,000 volumes in all. Louis IX later remarked that only skilled theologians should dispute with Jews, but that laymen, if confronted with blasphemy against Christ, ought to draw the sword and run them through the bowels as far as it will go with it.