Thank you. It is a rare person that understand my strategy of carpet-bombing heretics and ignorants is not due to personal ego, but rather, because it works. The shock and awe of such affronts often get people to see things they ignored and in due course come to the truth. Even if they are not often grateful for my methods, heh!
Have stated on past threads but to save time for fellow readers. Here you go. My first few experiences with The Kurgan resulted in me rage blocking on SG about 3 1/2 yrs ago as of this post. Mostly bc at that time I was, and still am, an emotional whamen that was being too egotistical to actually be understanding. After reading Voxs work on the SSH I came across one of Kurgans OG blogs from a post on SG; The Theoretical Models of Society https://www.thekurganblog.com/category/theoretical-models-of-society/
From that point on I have been a dedicated reader and supporter. Being more informed about 1958 Sedevacantist Catholicism has also increased my confidence spiritually. I started my journey with the Bear community, discovered the Dark Lord, and eventually to The Kurgan. The good, the true, and the beautiful always finds a way.
A writer with experience from action, not projection, and presenting for others less intrepid what is possible with faith and tenaciousness are at the core of why Kurgan gets a regular read. Plus, no AI slop!
I converted downstream of reading your books. Thank you. I don't fit with the Lutherans and Lavenders running my local Novus Ordo, so I read you, Barnhardt, and the Saints.
Thank you for commenting. Ann is of course in deep error, as I have pointed out for years at the OG blog (just search for her name using the search me button there), since she thinks all the fake Popes except the last two were legitimate.
I won't dispute you there. Her work on diabolical narcissism, however, is invaluable. I was raised as close to the role of an alter boy as a girl can get in a Calvinist "church." Half a dozen siblings now some variation of blue hair/leftist, which everyone oddly finds more acceptable than me simply reading Trent. Now, pray I find a husband!
I don't find guns scary but I've only fired Lee Enfields and a submachine gun (forget the type but probably WWII vintage), but the pistol/revolvers listed I have no experience of. Would love to try them all, tho.
I assume you might live in the SUKK (Soviet United Kak Kingdom) so may not have handguns available. In which case I suggest you strongly consider emigration. Or possibly revolution. Heh.
I did, and... I did (the former, not the latter; too old for that). No guns here, either. But the people here are not crazy. Unlike the SUKK which is completely unrecognizable.
Still telepathic, I see. I'm okay but feeling doxxed with the accuracy😂 I've been getting into chase hughes channel and reading your blogs to rewire my brain
You are reliably wrong about a little, and reliably correct about much. I have a soft spot for the SMLE, but If the shite comes gimme an AK. Because simple and designed to be maintained by Soviet grunts with a litre of vodka in them works grid down. And handguns -- what fits my mit and what I have practiced with. Which will not happen as they are banned.
He wants to jump into the briar patch? Your tactics are correct. The division now is between those who believe in Christ and those who put their faith in the institution. Which is why you have hardcore prots as allies. The antigravity stuff in my head is still weird: not all the Satanic perverts are Freemasons or Askenazi but that is the way to bet.
But it is hard to apply right now. I heard about it when I was in my first year in Uni but I'm not an engineer and concentrated on getting through my (high) courseload.
In the ideal world I would be putting up solar panels and using Iron Nickel (Edison) batteries to store this but sourcing the batteries is ultra difficult where I live and I don't want Lithium thermal runaway near a wooden house. (Again, you build in wood where I live because we consider anything below a Richter 6 earthquake noise).
I think Mars is incorrect: I don't have the time to investigate and my background is population health plus clinical work, not enginering.
I disagree theologically, I am a Calvinist not a Thomist.
You need to have allies but they are not going to agree with everything you say. There is a balance between having sufficient agreement to back each other and letting in the liberal idiots. My worry is that my church group -- the Presbyterian version of the Sexes in NZ -- is too small. My suggestion is that the hard core bel3ivers defend each other and I have seen purity spirals kill communities./
You’re absolutely wrong on Mars. A recent review by the same AI Vox used to find errors in his own work rated it 7/10 with the core principle of the thesis being essentially proven. The missing 3 points being die to factors that frankly don’t change the base premise at all (origin of the catastrophe, name of the ETs etc).
Calvinism is absolutely retarded though, and possibly the epitome of binary thinking, so there isn’t going to be any middle ground there, and it informs your other “thoughts” too, so… yeah I’m not going to lose sleep pondering anything you disagree with me on.
Lastly, purity spirals have ALWAYS killed Protestant communities. And always will. Because they are founded on false foundations. Sedevacantism is growing world-wide and we are now being called to arms by a valid Bishop. Softly and gently for now, but Sedes will continue to grow and you know why? Because we ensure any deviation from the faith is immediately pointed out as soon as we see it. But unlike in Protestant circles, it’s never about the person, just the arguments. Because ego is known by us to be mere pride, a sin. And roman law that informs catholic logic is as clear and finite as math, being based in the pure logic of the Divine mind, God’s Justice, Charity, and Love.
You're a fellow Sedevacantist who isn't afraid to speak frankly about true Catholicism.
Thank you. It is a rare person that understand my strategy of carpet-bombing heretics and ignorants is not due to personal ego, but rather, because it works. The shock and awe of such affronts often get people to see things they ignored and in due course come to the truth. Even if they are not often grateful for my methods, heh!
You are ahead of the curve with many things and your readers are fortunate that you supply an ample amount of breadcrumbs that we may follow along.
Thanks
Have stated on past threads but to save time for fellow readers. Here you go. My first few experiences with The Kurgan resulted in me rage blocking on SG about 3 1/2 yrs ago as of this post. Mostly bc at that time I was, and still am, an emotional whamen that was being too egotistical to actually be understanding. After reading Voxs work on the SSH I came across one of Kurgans OG blogs from a post on SG; The Theoretical Models of Society https://www.thekurganblog.com/category/theoretical-models-of-society/
From that point on I have been a dedicated reader and supporter. Being more informed about 1958 Sedevacantist Catholicism has also increased my confidence spiritually. I started my journey with the Bear community, discovered the Dark Lord, and eventually to The Kurgan. The good, the true, and the beautiful always finds a way.
The blog makes me think and often confronts my preconceived notions
A writer with experience from action, not projection, and presenting for others less intrepid what is possible with faith and tenaciousness are at the core of why Kurgan gets a regular read. Plus, no AI slop!
I converted downstream of reading your books. Thank you. I don't fit with the Lutherans and Lavenders running my local Novus Ordo, so I read you, Barnhardt, and the Saints.
Thank you for commenting. Ann is of course in deep error, as I have pointed out for years at the OG blog (just search for her name using the search me button there), since she thinks all the fake Popes except the last two were legitimate.
I won't dispute you there. Her work on diabolical narcissism, however, is invaluable. I was raised as close to the role of an alter boy as a girl can get in a Calvinist "church." Half a dozen siblings now some variation of blue hair/leftist, which everyone oddly finds more acceptable than me simply reading Trent. Now, pray I find a husband!
You will. Just have to also not be too shy to ask. See a link I posted to notes
I hope so. I might be misunderstanding you: You mean I should ask a man on a date?
Yes you should. https://substack.com/@thekurgan1/note/c-205805971?r=2gid6q&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Colt 1911 for utility, Magnum .357 for the aesthetics. For time travel i go with the magnum.
I don't find guns scary but I've only fired Lee Enfields and a submachine gun (forget the type but probably WWII vintage), but the pistol/revolvers listed I have no experience of. Would love to try them all, tho.
I assume you might live in the SUKK (Soviet United Kak Kingdom) so may not have handguns available. In which case I suggest you strongly consider emigration. Or possibly revolution. Heh.
I did, and... I did (the former, not the latter; too old for that). No guns here, either. But the people here are not crazy. Unlike the SUKK which is completely unrecognizable.
As my grandad used to say: old are the dead.
If I may ask what country are you in?
The land of the falling yen. aka Nippon.
Ah. Safe enough. Maybe you can have a “decorative” tachi though…
Filled out. Thanks.
It is my duty as the high priestess to keep up and I like Truth
Is it really you though? I thought you were placed in a bricked up wall somewhere...
Still telepathic, I see. I'm okay but feeling doxxed with the accuracy😂 I've been getting into chase hughes channel and reading your blogs to rewire my brain
DM if you want/are. The wife was concerned.
You are reliably wrong about a little, and reliably correct about much. I have a soft spot for the SMLE, but If the shite comes gimme an AK. Because simple and designed to be maintained by Soviet grunts with a litre of vodka in them works grid down. And handguns -- what fits my mit and what I have practiced with. Which will not happen as they are banned.
Go on. Tell me what I am reliably wrong about.
He wants to jump into the briar patch? Your tactics are correct. The division now is between those who believe in Christ and those who put their faith in the institution. Which is why you have hardcore prots as allies. The antigravity stuff in my head is still weird: not all the Satanic perverts are Freemasons or Askenazi but that is the way to bet.
But all the freemasons and Ashkenazi are satanic perverts.
Or their willing minions and slaves eg. almost everyone in popular music and film.
Antigravity is a fact. TT Brown proved it experimentally. Engineering is not theory.
But it is hard to apply right now. I heard about it when I was in my first year in Uni but I'm not an engineer and concentrated on getting through my (high) courseload.
In the ideal world I would be putting up solar panels and using Iron Nickel (Edison) batteries to store this but sourcing the batteries is ultra difficult where I live and I don't want Lithium thermal runaway near a wooden house. (Again, you build in wood where I live because we consider anything below a Richter 6 earthquake noise).
You can make giant batteries fairly cheap. But none of this relates to antigravity nor what I am supposedly reliably wrong on…
I think Mars is incorrect: I don't have the time to investigate and my background is population health plus clinical work, not enginering.
I disagree theologically, I am a Calvinist not a Thomist.
You need to have allies but they are not going to agree with everything you say. There is a balance between having sufficient agreement to back each other and letting in the liberal idiots. My worry is that my church group -- the Presbyterian version of the Sexes in NZ -- is too small. My suggestion is that the hard core bel3ivers defend each other and I have seen purity spirals kill communities./
You’re absolutely wrong on Mars. A recent review by the same AI Vox used to find errors in his own work rated it 7/10 with the core principle of the thesis being essentially proven. The missing 3 points being die to factors that frankly don’t change the base premise at all (origin of the catastrophe, name of the ETs etc).
Calvinism is absolutely retarded though, and possibly the epitome of binary thinking, so there isn’t going to be any middle ground there, and it informs your other “thoughts” too, so… yeah I’m not going to lose sleep pondering anything you disagree with me on.
Lastly, purity spirals have ALWAYS killed Protestant communities. And always will. Because they are founded on false foundations. Sedevacantism is growing world-wide and we are now being called to arms by a valid Bishop. Softly and gently for now, but Sedes will continue to grow and you know why? Because we ensure any deviation from the faith is immediately pointed out as soon as we see it. But unlike in Protestant circles, it’s never about the person, just the arguments. Because ego is known by us to be mere pride, a sin. And roman law that informs catholic logic is as clear and finite as math, being based in the pure logic of the Divine mind, God’s Justice, Charity, and Love.
Sedevacantis. Typo.
Yes, and they are among all nations.