Strategic Overview of the alleged killer of the Insurance CEO

If it's even him

So… the narrative is that a very intelligent young man, with serious back problems and whose mother had extreme neuropathy, who was refused the financial support for these health issues by the insurance company that has a refusal rate of about 32% when compared to the industry average of 16%, decided to make an example of the CEO of said insurance company. The young man shot the CEO three times, using a rather rare type of commercially available handgun somewhat modelled on the Welrod of WWII fame. Each time, though it was not necessary, he also cleared the gun, ejecting a full unspent round that had written on it the three words Deny, Delay, Depose, (one on each round) which is the standard technique that insurance companies use to avoid paying, basically running the victim into the ground with bureaucracy and hoping he/she dies before the claim comes due. And since people on insurance for health reasons can’t afford to sue, this is often the outcome.

There are some interesting things to note of this narrative, and I will opine on them as a mere observer, promoting or condoning nothing, but merely making observations that I think are worthy taking note of.

Was it even him?

It seems very convenient that this gentleman, who had essentially got away with murder, was supposedly spotted and recognised by a McDonald’s employee, a week after the manhunt had started and, incredibly (literally, I don’t believe it) the gentleman in question, supposedly the killer, was:

1. Wearing the same clothes he had on for the murder

2. Had his manifesto on him

3. Had the weapon and silencer used on him

Some are saying the young man, named as Luigi Mangione “wanted” to get caught. If so why not give himself up? And if he did not want to get caught, all he had to do was get rid of the weapon, not have a manifesto on him regarding the killing, and change clothes. Honestly, if he had done that he would have got away with it. Considering that Luigi is said to have a 130+ IQ was a valedictorian at his university, and his (alleged) online statements are at least coherent and intelligent, it seems absurd he would not have done this.

Far more likely, in my opinion, is that he is our day’s Lee Harvey Oswald. And his only permitted or seen statement was a shouted one while he was being escorted to detention, and he said something like “This is an injustice that insults the intelligence of the American people”.

I can see why someone with 130+ IQ would feel that way, especially if, like me at his age, he may not yet have processed the very real thing that is the IQ gap, but if Luigi is innocent, I have terrible news for him. The intelligence of the American people (and humanity in general) is barely above that of a rutting chimp on crack.

Worse, even if it were not, not a single one of them will lift a finger to see actual justice done.

Which brings me to the second point:

The Alleged Narrative of Luigi Mangione

If you read all the writing currently available that is attributed to him, one can hardly criticise Luigi’s take on things. His alleged reasons and reasoning behind the murder make perfect sense and are absolutely logical. They are also rooted in the seeking of justice not merely for himself or his mother personally, but in a wider social context. Making him in essence a martyr, and at that, one that can be admired.

This reaction was probably not foreseen by the powers that be, and for those of you that have read my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church, you might remember that the Freemasons that run things absolutely do NOT want anyone that goes up against them to be thought of as a hero. They specifically make reference to the fact that anyone that gets caught and will be executed for “crimes” against them must be painted in the worst possible light, as a crazy person, a weakling, a broken human being, cowardly, obsessive, crazy, and whatever other pejorative, and indeed they go so far as to indicate that drugs will be used to make sure they are not defiant in their last moments before the hangman’s noose.

I mention this, because the initial reaction to Luigi was overwhelmingly positive by really, everyone. Grifters like Ben Shapiro, trying to present this as some “loonie leftist” killing a good man, got completely slated in their own comment sections by people from the extreme left as well as the extreme right. No doubt giving Benji the shock of his grifter life, as he realised that the façade of “left vs. right” is crumbling and he is now simply seen as the Zionist shill and bought and paid for grifter/gatekeeper he has always been.

So, after that overwhelming show of support, what do the powers that be do? They publish a picture of Luigi in custody, showing that he allegedly has wet his pants through pissing himself. Supposedly out of fear I guess. Except the “wet patch” is really not in line with anyone actually doing that, and far more in line with someone throwing a glass of water directly on your lap, probably while sitting.

So, from a very coherent ideology, a well-liked and positive response to his actions, suddenly they are trying to make Luigi be some crazy kid who pisses himself when arrested. Again, sorry, but I don’t buy it at all.

At any rate, I want to present a few of the alleged data relating to him below, then conclude with an observation relating to his supposed ideology and the logical inferences we can make if we consider his alleged position.

First a bit about his supposed view of things, starting from the oldest to the most recent posts on various platforms:

So let’s say it really is him, and he really did this. Can you really argue against his points? Especially the one that states that they want us to be non-violent, because that is the only thing that will stop them from doing everything they are doing to us:

injecting us with genetic poisons, spraying us daily with he same crap from the air, installing systems of control so oppressive it literally sucks the joy of life out of people and make us all so many penned in cattle. Digital money, 5G, controls and regulations on farming your own food, inserting “vaccines” in everything you eat, and on and on and on.

If a thousand men in each country organised themselves and decided that they were willing to die to change things at all costs, and were also prepared to do violence, I doubt any but the most militarised of governments would last a week.

Certainly, throughout Europe, the routing of the politicians would be pretty much instant.

Luigi’s view of things is really not wrong. And strategically, if he is in fact innocent, it becomes interesting to see if he really wrote those things or not. If he did, and he is innocent, then the pedovores running things thought it would make a good spectacle to make an example of him because “he fit the profile”, and also, in doing so, they have two more positives (in their mind) the first is outing anyone that supports this view, but that backfired. Because the support is the overwhelmingly majority of humanity, so it becomes hard to single out “rebels”, instead, they realise that… loops, they may have just given a BUNCH of people some ideas.

Secondly, by “capturing” him, they push the narrative that it is impossible to kill one of the puppets nominally in charge and get away with it. Except he did get away with it, for over a week, and if he had got rid of all the stuff they allegedly found on him as gift-wrapped bow, there is no way he could have been convicted by any jury on the planet.

Even as it stands, because this is in America, and because jury nullification is a thing there, if that jury were ever to be composed of actual normal citizens, they could simply sit through he whole trial and then unanimously decide the guy is not guilty, regardless of the evidence against him. At the very least they could get a mistrial and/or eventual acquittal if as much as one juror simply holds out.

Now, aside all the absurd situational evidence supposedly found against him five days later and spotted by a McD employee, who clearly was passed over by the FBI if he has to flip burgers but is able to spot the guy responsible for a murder based on… his eyes in a grainy image?

here is a couple more reasons why I think Luigi is just a patsy, like Lee Harvey Oswald was:

His apparent protestation that this whole clown show is absurd:

And then there is the humiliation ritual after they realise this guy is popular.

Now, I know he’s Italian and therefore well-endowed, but unless his anaconda was firing out piss at 4 bar of pressure in an uncontrolled way, and down each leg, but not really between them, that is NOT the pattern of someone who pissed himself, but rather just of someone who had a drink thrown in their lap, probably while sitting down.

Lastly, there is his name, which may well be real, but in my 55 years on Earth, I have found the Universe, or God, has a sense of humour and leaves clues. Mangione in Italian means someone who eats a lot.

And I think that is what the pedovores at the top of the pyramid want us to do… eat it all… swallow it hook, line and sinker, as the herd of domesticated beast for slaughter they see us as.