Why Scott Adams is a Crappy "hypnotist" trying to protect pedophiles unsuccessfully.
Yes, he is apparently dying of stupidity and I was going to let him do so in peace, but then...
Regulars here will know that I took Scott Adams of Dilbert fame to task a while back for basically being not just so stupid to have injected himself with the death juice (mostly for what I believe are reasons of lack of genuine “game”), but for also promoting it originally, and then being so dishonest afterwards in trying to justify his idiotic choice, as if those who chose not to inject themselves with genetic altering serums that have been known to kill the test animals for 30 years prior were just “lucky”. Or as if there was no information to prove that injecting yourself with murder-juice is not the smart thing to do.
But you will also know that after he stated he was on his way out this summer,1 I was content to let him die in peace.
But now he’s just gone and tried to defend pedovores in public so… let us first see what he says:
And let’s see some of the reactions of normal people… and his replies…
And here we see Scott’s “greatest influencer” method in play from the “hypnosis” bag of tricks he claims to be so good at.2
That tweet up there? It’s one of the very first and flimsiest of what is known as “the double-bind”, which is described as an Ericksonian technique. And in this case, about as badly executed an example of it as I have ever seen.
Scott is presenting the situation as:
If you tell the truth kids will die in a massive war that will absolutely happen.
If you tell the truth to get “justice” for the victims, you will cause a “bigger harm” to the world (and other children).
He then applies a hypothetical number of children that must die for his hypothetical scenario, that is in any case not related to the issue at all.
So for those that need things explained in small words:
There is absolutely no evidence at all that exposing pedovores and pedophiles and child rapist/murderers publicly with 100% solid proof will actually result in a war. It is more likely it will result in a small revolution where said creatures get hung from the nearest lampposts, and that is all to the good.
There is no moral connection between the two issues. But IF there were… Let’s say that telling the truth about the fact that a Talmudic-Jewish-ideology dominated planet, run by blackmailing pedovores IS how things really work (it is, sadly), and let’s further say that exposing that would result in war, then the moral question is NOT if you should tell the truth or not because of the consequences of war or not, but rather, what planet do you wish to live on? One where the pedovores run things, or one where they get used as piñatas before being incinerated and every trace of them is disappeared from the Earth? Because I know which planet I’d choose; and I don’t care how many wars we may have to have to get there.
Furthermore, we absolutely KNOW the pedovores are raping and killing LITTLE CHILDREN right now. But NO ONE, and certainly not stupid Scott who injects himself with death-serum, can know what the consequences of such exposure would be, but any rational person might come to a few conclusions, such as:
Americans might just realise what Israel is and what it has done and continues to do to America and Americans.
Funding it might stop.
Mass media companies might go bankrupt. And we’d let them.
Ditto banks.
Maybe the genocide Israel is doing now might just slow down a tad once the world realises what the followers of the Talmud do and have done for thousands of years, and how this planet is really run.
The pedos might all be put to death or at least jailed, regardless of the fact they are politicians, judges, lawyers, senators, presidents, etc, etc, etc. Because people just MIGHT finally revolt and do away with ANY criminal “justice” system that is in fact aiding and abetting the pedos. If that requires some chaos, a revolution even, so be it. It would in any case mostly be limited to pro-pedos vs. humans. And I’m perfectly happy to fight that war against the pro-pedos for as long as it takes. So are most normal humans. Those who are not normal, nor human, as far as I am concerned, are best exposed and removed, because I sure as shit don’t want such creatures living on my planet any more than I would want vampires living in my spare room.
And given that such exposure might in fact result in just what is described in the three points above, it is surely worth trying it out. Also because… it has not been done before, and things are not exactly getting “better” are they? Quite the contrary.
But let us continue to see how Scott turns this all around to us all cheering for Pedos, shall we?
Uh… so… not quite the world-influencer you thought you were, eh Scott?
But Scott is not known for his not doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down ladies and gentlemen, and here we see him AGAIN, using the “double-bind” technique, about as proficiently and intelligently as a doped up, cocaine-fuelled chimp might conduct brain surgery.
But notice that Gabriel Coleman turns the absurd “double-bind” choice (either your kids die or else justice never happens, so you need to allow justice to never happen) right back on him and Scott, exposed for the idiot sycophant to power and possibly pedos that he is, remains in total silence.
So yeah… fuck Scott Adams, and the sooner this planet is rid of people like him that make such proposals as the “intelligent” choice, the better.
But my final thought on this is also one more thing no one has mentioned…
Apparently, there is now good evidence that the Vaxx shot shrinks the Amygdala, or even completely destroys it. Which is why so many Vaxxed look like intellectual Zombies, just an inch away from actually rabidly biting people. And some vestigial part of them knows it. And their behaviours become more and more driven by rancour, envy, rage, and jealousy towards those that made better and saner choices.
I think this kind of post was done by Scott on purpose, to fan the flames of discord, because secularist that he is, and death approaching, he wants to burn the world with him, like all boomers of his kind do.
Well Scott, it’s not going to happen.
The world will finally be rid of you soon, and we will all be better off for it, and soon, no one will even remember you existed.
Good riddance.
As a result of what looks like a turbo-cancer that was definitely, clearly, obviously, not the result of injecting himself with a turbo-cancer inducing cocktail of death so he could take his gold-digger wife to Bora-Bora, and later to Greece to show off for his (still married) boomer friends how cool he was with the young trophy on his arm.
I will agree he has brainwashed himself into thinking he is a lot smarter than he actually is, but I’m not sure that makes him quite the great influencer and hypnotist he thinks he is.
Say full disclosure DID start a war? How many wars have already been started as part of this madness and how many will be started in the future as part of the plot? How many people will die if we leave things as they are? How many cultures will be destroyed by globalism? Because I think that's what this is: the Anglo/Israeli axis is the globalist corporatists, and they are the ones running rampant all over planet Earth. I say this as an extremely Anglo, WASP poor cousin in the USA.
When has the world ever not had some kind of war going on? That's one of the stupidest arguments he could've used. Yes, let's allow a horrible evil to continue to be done against the innocent because something "worse" might possibly, maybe, happen to a bunch of other people. Cry me a river, Scott. One wonders if his name might just be on said list