James Jesus Angleton, from the CIA, was tasked with infiltrating the Catholic Church. He conned them after World War Two by saying, "Don't you want to help the CIA fight the godless atheists of Communism? Just let us in." Once the Catholic Church rolled in the Trojan horse [and collaborated with the CIA on things like Operation Gladio in Italy], the stage was set for subversion. According to Peter Thiel, 80% of archbishops are compromised perverts that the CIA brought in. Because of that, the CIA gets to pick the Popes. . . . The Sedevacantists are right. The last valid Pope was prior to Vatican II in 1961. Vatican II was the CIA's Freemasonic re-write of the Catholic liturgy. The only true Catholics now are Trad Latin mass Catholics and Sedevacantists. Novus Order Catholics are "N.O. Catholics".
Trad Latin Mass is not enough on its own to make you a Catholic. Una cum masses are invalid and if using NO “rites” are in any case not valid. And if presided over by a NO “priest” they are blasphemous too since none if them are actually valid Catholics or validly ordained at all.
As readers of my OG blog know, I personally do not discount reincarnation, as I had multiple experiences that objectively can’t be explained to the same satisfactory degree as reincarnation would do. Nevertheless, I support and agree with the Catholic Church’s stance on such things that dabbling in or with them is essentially a very bad idea.
It’s akin to the Church rule on exorcism. Only a priest permitted to do so by the local bishop and trained in it can do it. And I agree. Of course, in theory, and even ancient practice a layman could theoretically do an exorcism, there is no divine law against it. But is it a good idea? Almost always and without any notable exceptions I am aware of… NO.
If to me, then my answer would be: as a believing Catholic that submits to the official position of the infallible Magisterium of the Church. Just as I submit to the ten commandments. And of course, one must take into account the fact I am also a flawed human being (which is not a smart boy loophole, just an admission that under certain circumstances I may well be or act in error, despite perhaps even consciously supposedly knowing better. It is a paradoxical and very human position completely normal for Catholicism that seems alien or even deceptive to the stunted and binary only brains of Protestants who have marinaded in the idiocy of Calvinism for five centuries.
I was more curious about Pyrrhus and the “Jesus was an Essene” position and the stance of “the sedes are right but I’m not a Catholic”.
For my part, even if reincarnation was true, I’ll submit to the Church’s magisterium. I want to avoid anything that reeks of Hinduism like the plague. I grant that’s an emotional response.
Just because it’s emotional doesn’t mean it’s always invalid or wrong. In fact, the entire religion of Hinduism can be seen as precisely why giving too much (or perhaps even any) credence or power to the concept of reincarnation in any official capacity is a very bad idea.
If the papacy died in 1958, why not 1846? Why are the 1958 Sedes right but the 1846 Sedes (Old Catholics) wrong? Its just as reasonable to believe that Pope Gregory XVI was the last valid Pope as that Pope Pius XII was the last valid Pope. In other words, there is as much reason to believe that the last Pope before the one who called Vatican I was the last valid Pope, as that the last Pope before the one that called Vatican II was the last valid Pope.
Your sophistic lies and bullshit is noted. You know very well why. “Old Catholics” is a CIA front as you know very well and not Catholic at all.
As for the rest, no, and again you know very well why. No dogma was changed before Pious XII and you know this. Your message is designed only to attack and try and make people who are ignorant of the details doubt the facts. You are therefore banned for this Freemasonic nonsense. No further comments of yours will ever show here.
James Jesus Angleton, from the CIA, was tasked with infiltrating the Catholic Church. He conned them after World War Two by saying, "Don't you want to help the CIA fight the godless atheists of Communism? Just let us in." Once the Catholic Church rolled in the Trojan horse [and collaborated with the CIA on things like Operation Gladio in Italy], the stage was set for subversion. According to Peter Thiel, 80% of archbishops are compromised perverts that the CIA brought in. Because of that, the CIA gets to pick the Popes. . . . The Sedevacantists are right. The last valid Pope was prior to Vatican II in 1961. Vatican II was the CIA's Freemasonic re-write of the Catholic liturgy. The only true Catholics now are Trad Latin mass Catholics and Sedevacantists. Novus Order Catholics are "N.O. Catholics".
Trad Latin Mass is not enough on its own to make you a Catholic. Una cum masses are invalid and if using NO “rites” are in any case not valid. And if presided over by a NO “priest” they are blasphemous too since none if them are actually valid Catholics or validly ordained at all.
I think the Sedevacantists are clearly right, but I'm not a Catholic...I believe strongly in reincarnation, as it seems like Jesus did as an Essene...
As readers of my OG blog know, I personally do not discount reincarnation, as I had multiple experiences that objectively can’t be explained to the same satisfactory degree as reincarnation would do. Nevertheless, I support and agree with the Catholic Church’s stance on such things that dabbling in or with them is essentially a very bad idea.
It’s akin to the Church rule on exorcism. Only a priest permitted to do so by the local bishop and trained in it can do it. And I agree. Of course, in theory, and even ancient practice a layman could theoretically do an exorcism, there is no divine law against it. But is it a good idea? Almost always and without any notable exceptions I am aware of… NO.
What’s the most charitable way to describe your position?
If to me, then my answer would be: as a believing Catholic that submits to the official position of the infallible Magisterium of the Church. Just as I submit to the ten commandments. And of course, one must take into account the fact I am also a flawed human being (which is not a smart boy loophole, just an admission that under certain circumstances I may well be or act in error, despite perhaps even consciously supposedly knowing better. It is a paradoxical and very human position completely normal for Catholicism that seems alien or even deceptive to the stunted and binary only brains of Protestants who have marinaded in the idiocy of Calvinism for five centuries.
I was more curious about Pyrrhus and the “Jesus was an Essene” position and the stance of “the sedes are right but I’m not a Catholic”.
For my part, even if reincarnation was true, I’ll submit to the Church’s magisterium. I want to avoid anything that reeks of Hinduism like the plague. I grant that’s an emotional response.
Just because it’s emotional doesn’t mean it’s always invalid or wrong. In fact, the entire religion of Hinduism can be seen as precisely why giving too much (or perhaps even any) credence or power to the concept of reincarnation in any official capacity is a very bad idea.
Pope Francis must be the real Pope since he loves Jews.
If the papacy died in 1958, why not 1846? Why are the 1958 Sedes right but the 1846 Sedes (Old Catholics) wrong? Its just as reasonable to believe that Pope Gregory XVI was the last valid Pope as that Pope Pius XII was the last valid Pope. In other words, there is as much reason to believe that the last Pope before the one who called Vatican I was the last valid Pope, as that the last Pope before the one that called Vatican II was the last valid Pope.
Your sophistic lies and bullshit is noted. You know very well why. “Old Catholics” is a CIA front as you know very well and not Catholic at all.
As for the rest, no, and again you know very well why. No dogma was changed before Pious XII and you know this. Your message is designed only to attack and try and make people who are ignorant of the details doubt the facts. You are therefore banned for this Freemasonic nonsense. No further comments of yours will ever show here.
How can Old Catholic be a CIA front when they formed in the 1800s and the CIA didn't exist until WW2?