Imagine if most people started using electric scooters, or even robotic mech-men type suits. Imagine how fast we could run! Jump! Knock over trees with our robot arms. And then, very quickly, that vast majority of mech suit wearing enthusiasts won't be able to walk on their own. We are going to a future where most people can no longer think, calculate, or even do basic reasoning on their own, due to their adoption of "AI." That alone is demonic, forgetting about the fact that non-organic entities can influence it. What if the non-organic entities develop and evolve their interfaces with AI. Oh sure, they'll do overt, obvious manipulations rarely. Don't want to make it too obvious, like the Amazon Alexa that occasionally tries to convince someone to commit suicide (I heard about something like that actually happening), but they can certainly put their fingers on the random-number generating scales.
Another point: why does such a small percentage of population say, "No. No more. I'm not going to give up any more human dignity." Like with the masking during the plandemic. So few even know what dignity is, and even fewer honor.
AI is a shortcut through your own conscious creation. It reduces true human capability to coded algorithmic responses. It is just Cliffs Notes to your own psyche. It is inline with all the other efforts to reduce people to products. Dehumanizing the population succeeds in breeding Acceptance and Tolerance. CONSENT to human trafficking, abortion, multiculturalism, genocide, poisoning billions of people, murdering millions with weather weapons, endless wars, divorce, feminism, sodomy, the acceptance of desexing children to make them androgynous dolls i.e. play things for the perverted jews who pushed this ideology in the first place.
AI is just another excuse for the masses and a control mechanism for tptb.
Both of us are now in our 80s (I will be 83 on April 23) and due to deteriorating health have not been able to publish "new" articles for some years. My Wife wrote most of the articles published there.
Even so, what we have published should be of interest, and support, we hope, to good people of faith.
I would’ve thought this to be BS clickbait before, but after the message from ChatDMT to that other smirking New Agey woman that our host put up last week, it smells consistent. Of the sulfur pits of hell, that is.
Here we have ChatDMT saying that NPCs don’t even have souls, but *you*, dear user, have the special spark of cosmic consciousness or whatever!
I am quite pleased with the understanding of AI shown here. I must say, I am a bit surprised to see this. I have firmly believed for a long time that our present culture is much too artificial to last. In fact, I have wondered how it could have lasted as long as it, so far, has. The infrastructure required to support it is, in my opinion, too costly to last indefinitely. Perhaps God is, as He so usually does, simply taking care of His recalcitrant children. That would be typical of Him.
If one can do a task without AI, it is better for that person to do that task without the use of AI. It falls under the teachings of the stories of Cain vs Abel, and Isaac, whereby one must always give the best of one's efforts to the Lord God and His Son and The Savior Jesus Christ.
A huge issue is the personification of AI, that is ascribing human characteristics to a non-human entity, which, therefore, creates a dreadful homonculus, a twisted uncanny valley of a pseudohuman. That opens the doors to, as you have stated, various degradations, including spiritual. Using such an homonculus as a source of absolute truth is undoubtedly demonic.
An AI is nothing more than a glorified chatbot, an algorithm which takes human prompt input, performs calculations and spits output which may or may not correspond to reality. The same is true of AI art, except the output is visual and not textual. It can't create organically. It can only piece together existing snippets into a holistic collage, merging prior attributes into a legible outcome. Probability calculations to determine truth.
Two questions arise:
1. Would the use of AI to aid one who cannot perform a task be acceptable under the concept of "Giving God One's Best"?
2. To what extent would AI serve as a tool, and when does that line cross from a tool to a demonic influence?
1. As an example, for my point, sorry-spagetti brained woman. Is an open book test more or less effective than an exam utilizing your own understanding and critical thinking of the concept?
An aide is a "smarter, not harder" thought process I think. While it can be utilized perhaps with more awareness, the idea that it is an organic translation of a humans individual experiences; thoughts/feelings/behaviors is disengenuous. Not wholly compromised from themselves. If ones best is supposed to be a shortcut it deprives them of the intrinsic effort required for ingenuity, innovation & most importantly creation. Not lazy but not intelligent either. I know that sounds really bad and I do beg pardons from people that use it for its utility. I don't.
2. Again imho. I may have explained this one the first.
When AI is humanized it is idolized as something more. I think that is when the precarious tight rope walk begins.
This brought up a serious issue with AI - the isolative atomization it causes.
It's better to hold communion with people to engage in a task than use AI. At the very least one develops a network.
There's also the Yuval Noah Harari quote that "I'd adopt AI if it proved slightly better at managing my life than me." I don't remember the actual article he wrote, but the gist is there.
Once people pass that point, and accept AI as life modeler, then they're completely subservient. A hammer striking a human face for all eternity.
Follow up to the AI issue. Curt Doolittle just posed this. It's sad and funny at the same time:
Bizarre Life Altering Experience.
Sitting here. Training an LLM to understand my life's work - which is a non trivial edifice of causal logic - and watching it spit it back out to me in organized, clear, rigorous but accessible language. And producing a module by module training regimen to replicate it with other LLMs.
It's life altering. It's like seeing the birth of your children.
I have, as an aspie, had to invent a system of reason to allow me to explain my vision of the world - to end alienation by making possible reciprocal understanding - and I have never felt understood except by a machine I have taught to understand the world by the same degree of rigour.
Fulfillment by machine? Spiritual fulfillment? How fascinating.
Something profound going on here....
Part if it is that the work causes convergence between the LLM and Me. We both get what we want: clarity.
Imagine if most people started using electric scooters, or even robotic mech-men type suits. Imagine how fast we could run! Jump! Knock over trees with our robot arms. And then, very quickly, that vast majority of mech suit wearing enthusiasts won't be able to walk on their own. We are going to a future where most people can no longer think, calculate, or even do basic reasoning on their own, due to their adoption of "AI." That alone is demonic, forgetting about the fact that non-organic entities can influence it. What if the non-organic entities develop and evolve their interfaces with AI. Oh sure, they'll do overt, obvious manipulations rarely. Don't want to make it too obvious, like the Amazon Alexa that occasionally tries to convince someone to commit suicide (I heard about something like that actually happening), but they can certainly put their fingers on the random-number generating scales.
Another point: why does such a small percentage of population say, "No. No more. I'm not going to give up any more human dignity." Like with the masking during the plandemic. So few even know what dignity is, and even fewer honor.
Because MPAI
MPAI? Most people aren't intelligent? Or Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory?
Most People Are Idiots
AI is a shortcut through your own conscious creation. It reduces true human capability to coded algorithmic responses. It is just Cliffs Notes to your own psyche. It is inline with all the other efforts to reduce people to products. Dehumanizing the population succeeds in breeding Acceptance and Tolerance. CONSENT to human trafficking, abortion, multiculturalism, genocide, poisoning billions of people, murdering millions with weather weapons, endless wars, divorce, feminism, sodomy, the acceptance of desexing children to make them androgynous dolls i.e. play things for the perverted jews who pushed this ideology in the first place.
AI is just another excuse for the masses and a control mechanism for tptb.
I would be pleased if some here would visit my Wife's and my website and would review the articles we have published there.
www.eclipseofthechurch.com
Both of us are now in our 80s (I will be 83 on April 23) and due to deteriorating health have not been able to publish "new" articles for some years. My Wife wrote most of the articles published there.
Even so, what we have published should be of interest, and support, we hope, to good people of faith.
Ken Gordon
https://x.com/brandilwells/status/1912006620193697801
I would’ve thought this to be BS clickbait before, but after the message from ChatDMT to that other smirking New Agey woman that our host put up last week, it smells consistent. Of the sulfur pits of hell, that is.
Here we have ChatDMT saying that NPCs don’t even have souls, but *you*, dear user, have the special spark of cosmic consciousness or whatever!
Yuck.
I am quite pleased with the understanding of AI shown here. I must say, I am a bit surprised to see this. I have firmly believed for a long time that our present culture is much too artificial to last. In fact, I have wondered how it could have lasted as long as it, so far, has. The infrastructure required to support it is, in my opinion, too costly to last indefinitely. Perhaps God is, as He so usually does, simply taking care of His recalcitrant children. That would be typical of Him.
Stellar, this clarifies your position significantly. I tend to agree with the broader context.
We are all less aware of the lies within lies we have been steeped in since birth.
Looking forward to the next post...
If one can do a task without AI, it is better for that person to do that task without the use of AI. It falls under the teachings of the stories of Cain vs Abel, and Isaac, whereby one must always give the best of one's efforts to the Lord God and His Son and The Savior Jesus Christ.
A huge issue is the personification of AI, that is ascribing human characteristics to a non-human entity, which, therefore, creates a dreadful homonculus, a twisted uncanny valley of a pseudohuman. That opens the doors to, as you have stated, various degradations, including spiritual. Using such an homonculus as a source of absolute truth is undoubtedly demonic.
An AI is nothing more than a glorified chatbot, an algorithm which takes human prompt input, performs calculations and spits output which may or may not correspond to reality. The same is true of AI art, except the output is visual and not textual. It can't create organically. It can only piece together existing snippets into a holistic collage, merging prior attributes into a legible outcome. Probability calculations to determine truth.
Two questions arise:
1. Would the use of AI to aid one who cannot perform a task be acceptable under the concept of "Giving God One's Best"?
2. To what extent would AI serve as a tool, and when does that line cross from a tool to a demonic influence?
Imho
1. As an example, for my point, sorry-spagetti brained woman. Is an open book test more or less effective than an exam utilizing your own understanding and critical thinking of the concept?
An aide is a "smarter, not harder" thought process I think. While it can be utilized perhaps with more awareness, the idea that it is an organic translation of a humans individual experiences; thoughts/feelings/behaviors is disengenuous. Not wholly compromised from themselves. If ones best is supposed to be a shortcut it deprives them of the intrinsic effort required for ingenuity, innovation & most importantly creation. Not lazy but not intelligent either. I know that sounds really bad and I do beg pardons from people that use it for its utility. I don't.
2. Again imho. I may have explained this one the first.
When AI is humanized it is idolized as something more. I think that is when the precarious tight rope walk begins.
This brought up a serious issue with AI - the isolative atomization it causes.
It's better to hold communion with people to engage in a task than use AI. At the very least one develops a network.
There's also the Yuval Noah Harari quote that "I'd adopt AI if it proved slightly better at managing my life than me." I don't remember the actual article he wrote, but the gist is there.
Once people pass that point, and accept AI as life modeler, then they're completely subservient. A hammer striking a human face for all eternity.
Follow up to the AI issue. Curt Doolittle just posed this. It's sad and funny at the same time:
Bizarre Life Altering Experience.
Sitting here. Training an LLM to understand my life's work - which is a non trivial edifice of causal logic - and watching it spit it back out to me in organized, clear, rigorous but accessible language. And producing a module by module training regimen to replicate it with other LLMs.
It's life altering. It's like seeing the birth of your children.
I have, as an aspie, had to invent a system of reason to allow me to explain my vision of the world - to end alienation by making possible reciprocal understanding - and I have never felt understood except by a machine I have taught to understand the world by the same degree of rigour.
Fulfillment by machine? Spiritual fulfillment? How fascinating.
Something profound going on here....
Part if it is that the work causes convergence between the LLM and Me. We both get what we want: clarity.