The Main Problem with Humanity Today is you're all Weak and Cowardly

There really is no nice way to tell you.

I recently was made aware of this guy’s substack who says he is finally leaving the UK because it’s become a hellhole. I agree, and I left 4 years before him, so no argument there. I did reach out to him and he has initially responded but later gone silent. Maybe he’s busy, or maybe he thinks I am some freakish zealot too dangerous to know, whatever. He certainly can get any positives from my writings without getting to know me if that is what he prefers.

But in my trying to get to know more about him too, I read this piece he wrote on why the West is basically not having enough children.

Now, he clearly is well-read and erudite, and as a Latvian friend of mine put it tongue-in-cheek about a similar guy “You can see he finished high-school, you know?”

All good.

But his piece is far, far, too high-brow and complicated to be a reflection of the natural order of things.

I haven’t read enough from him yet to make my mind up as I did with the Tree of Woe guy who turns out to either be a meaningless NPC that spouts long pieces of pointless theory, or maybe he’s a fed trying to rope in anyone that can string together words of more than three syllables so they don’t cogitate something actually effective.

But my point is that nature, life, reality in general, is a lot simpler and far more brutal and to the point than such nice-sounding complicated theories, which really are nothing more than the flight of fanciful imagination.

The reason the West is not having more children is because Western man has become an unmitigated, pussyfied, half-faggot.

There is no way of putting it nicely.

Our Catholic ancestors had 12 children and they didn’t even have indoor plumbing some of the time, and they certainly did not have electricity, or Amazon deliveries, and if they had a bad harvest or a bit of bad luck they died, froze, starved or got killed by raiders.

Now people worry about having a second child because they may have to give up on renewing their iPhone yearly. Or maybe sweet Alyssya with the double y will not have violin lessons.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I am not advocating having 10 children if all you can feed them is US government cheese. Mainly because they’s be better off building slingshots and hunting rats for food than eating US cheese. But my point is that “marriage” today mostly means some lazy skank wants to go shopping with cuck’s gold card all day while he bangs his secretary at work and she does the pool-boy at home, but both pretend to have the perfect life. They get their iPhones upgraded yearly on an automatic plan and they holiday in Barbados, because the Maldives is passé.

The first sign of difficulty means she can divorce-rape him or he can dump her for the younger model. Struggling through life together —on those rare occasions it happens— happens mostly “for the children” instead of for and with each other. Yes, even when your other half is being an unreasonable pain in your ass, the point is that actual marriage, as opposed to the government licence giving you access to the husband’s funds, is meant to be a lifelong commitment that breaks only in case of death.

As the old joke goes, we Catholics never, ever, contemplate divorce at all. Murder, on the other hand…

But the point is that about the ONLY reason people often don’t even have two children, never mind six, is because they are soft, weak and selfish.

You know who is making six kids? Mohammed and Sheila, who survive on government hand-outs (and if the UK rape gangs are anything to go by, possibly trafficking your under-age sibling-less daughters).

You know why? Because regardless of whether Mohammed and Sheila are less educated than you, regardless of if they are good people or evil ones, regardless of pretty much anything else, one thing is certain: They are stronger than you.

And even if they happen to be the fourth generation of cousins marrying each other and their six children have an IQ of 70, there are going to be more of them than of yours. And in the end those numbers will make the difference in changing your entire culture, nation and your children’s lives in ways so drastic that the alternatives will not only not be even remembered, but will seem like utopian fiction.

Do you need to give your children the best chance possible? Sure.

But guess what… they need to exist in the first place before you can do that.

If I had bought into the boomer lies less and started earlier, instead of six I might have twelve of them by now. My young Catholic friends in their mid to late 20s who already had their first child, are ALL planning to field double digit number of children. And it is the right thing to do. Change the demographics. Get into politics at the local level from as grassroots as you can and start to change things.

And stop being quiet about the genociding they are trying to do to you.

There are still plenty more of us in the West for now than of our enemies. The only thing stopping you from speaking your mind is the fear of consequences. And some people are beginning to realise it and starting to speak up.

Get rid of the Satanic politicians. Start from the ground up in the local PTA meetings and work your way through the top. Replace as many of the pedophile servants known as police as you can. Enrol and change them from within. Or build a community of people that will not tolerate the enemy and their foot soldiers anywhere near you or your children.

Can you imagine your average Catholic Knight 500 years ago having one of his children raped by a foreign invader group and not immediately spending the rest of his days ensuring such people, those who helped them arrive, their friends, and anyone that was not immediately on his side of the argument, never darkened the shores of his nation ever again, and by means far more direct and permanent than we are able to use now?

Tens of thousands of children in the UK have been raped by Pakistani rape gangs and the lurid vermin acting as PM in that country today was the head of the Crown Prosecution Services at the time this stuff came out.

Here is an excerpt from a mass media outlet which as we know will tend to minimise these figures.

Where does the one million figure come from?

The estimate of one million victims has been mentioned in a number of different social media posts, including a post on X last week that said “MORE THAN ONE MILLION CHILD VICTIM [sic]”, and cited Ms Champion’s newspaper interview as its source. This was reposted by Mr Musk.

When we contacted Ms Champion to ask about the figure in 2020, she told us: “I extrapolated that Rotherham is a town [of] 200,000 and had 1,400 known victims of CSE [child sexual exploitation] between 1997-2013 and 15% of women report their rape – so scaled up.”

Ms Champion this week told us that her extrapolation involved scaling up the figures for a “70 year period”, acknowledging that was a “completely unreliable” estimate.

We are not sure exactly how Ms Champion’s calculation produces an estimate of about one million, but as we said in 2020, it is not a reliable method anyway. We cannot simply extrapolate the level of abuse in Rotherham to the rest of the country, because the rate of victimisation in Rotherham may have been higher or lower than average, as may the rate of reporting.

In our 2020 article, we said we also thought that the 15% figure came from a government report from 2013, meaning it may have represented the proportion of women who reported the most recent incident of serious sexual assault they had experienced. If so, this is not necessarily the same as the proportion of child exploitation victims identified in Rotherham.

A different estimate

Mr Musk also reposted a video shared by the X account of the political activist Tommy Robinson, showing a speech made in 2018 by the former leader of the UK Independence Party, Lord Pearson of Rannoch.

The post from Mr Robinson’s account said: “Lord Pearson questioned the CONservatives [sic] over the upwards of 250,000 British children gang raped by predominantly Pakistani men across every major city of the UK, this century alone!”

In his 2018 speech, Lord Pearson said: “If we extrapolate nationally the Jay report on Rotherham and other reports from Telford and Oxford, there appear to have been upwards of 250,000 young white girls raped in this century, very largely by Muslim men.”

Later, in another contribution using the figure in 2019, he referred to “250,000 victims of radical Muslim grooming gangs” and claimed this was “probably an underestimate”, adding: “If you take the accepted figure of 1,400 victims in Rotherham alone and extend it across the country, you come to a much larger figure. Indeed, Rotherham’s MP, the courageous Sarah Champion, has put the figure at 1 million.”

Full Fact has attempted to contact Lord Pearson to ask about the 250,000 figure, but we have not yet heard back. It’s not clear if Lord Pearson himself was the original source of the estimate.

An inquiry into abuse in Rotherham did say that its “conservative estimate is that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited” between 1997 and 2013. It’s unclear from Lord Pearson’s remarks how the 250,000 figure was calculated, which means it’s difficult to say how reliable it is. But any national extrapolation from one place, or a group of places, is based on the potentially unreliable assumption that similar rates of offending and reporting occurred throughout the country.

What data do we have?

We’ve not found any authoritative estimate of the total number of victims of grooming gangs in the UK, and the picture is also complicated by different definitions and understandings of what constitutes this kind of abuse.

The 2022 Jay inquiry’s report into child sexual exploitation by organised networks set out some of the difficulties in calculating any total figure, including the fact that there is no specific offence of child sexual exploitation, and the “subjective and thus variable” nature of flagging these offences manually.

Similarly, a 2020 Home Office report into “Group-based child sexual exploitation” did not offer an estimate for the total number of victims and said “a consistent challenge has been the paucity of data”. It said group-based child sexual exploitation was probably under-reported, and said it had identified “over 70” live investigations at the time, adding that this figure very likely would have been higher had more police forces provided data.

When we asked the Ministry of Justice, it told us that it did not publish any relevant data on the total number of victims.

Last year the government said a Grooming Gangs Taskforce set up in 2023 had helped police forces identify and protect “over 4,000 victims” in a 12-month period.

Did you notice that 4000 figure in a 12 month period? And do you really think the UK police who have been protecting pedophiles from criticism, never mind arrest and prosecution, for decades really caught all the victims?

Or that this evil, satanist signalling bitch has your children’s safety at heart?

Do you think it’s a coincidence that the BBC has the statue of a pedophile outside its headquarters and Jimmy Saville was buddies with all the top guys in there and in government too?

Or that labour just voted against having any sort of further investigation into the Pakistani rape gangs?

Are you shocked?

Do I find that shocking? No, not really.

As far as I am concerned, my view is that Kier Starmer is a de facto Satanist, and implementing the policies of Luciferian origin as are his various colleagues and minions, who literally make the Freemasonic Satanic sign they all identify each other with publicly. I am certainly not surprised by him.

What I am saddened by is the fact that apparently in the UK there are at least a few hundreds of thousands of men, fathers, who seem to have collectively removed their own balls and swallowed them along with any shred of dignity, pride, or fatherly instinct.

By any credible account there are well-upwards of 250,000 fathers who have had their children sexually assaulted, raped and abused, as well as arrested by the police that are supposed to be protecting them; and not a single one of them has done anything about it, and none of them have organised themselves and removed the entire government of the British Isles from its ivory towers and rooted them out, placing them in cages and then immediately reinstating the death penalty and cleansing the UK’s gene pool of such creatures. Why is that?

Why are a minimum of 250,000 supposed MEN doing absolutely nothing?

Italy is not ideal either, but such a situation would absolutely not be tolerated here, and whether individually and illegally, or en masse, there would be action taken.

The worst abusers are the fake clerics of the Satanic Novus Ordo Church which has pretended to be the Catholic Church since 1958. The only actual Catholics left are the Sedevacantist that are aware of this (of which I am one).

In 15 years the Satanic Bergoglian led “Church” has abused something under 6000 people, counting the entire country. This compares to probably what happens in a single day in the UK.

And even then, some of these fake priests find themselves facing their deserved end regardless of laws that I am sure we all agree with, and are designed to not allow vigilantism. Luckily, the people that had initially been sentenced to life in prison for the murder of the pedophile priest, were later found to be completely innocent of the crime on appeal.

Assolti per non aver commesso il fatto. Questa è la sentenza pronunciata dalla Corte di assise di appello per Giuseppe Massaro, 58 anni di Sant’Agata dei Goti, e Generoso Nasta, 33 anni di San Felice a Cancello. Erano stati condannati all’ergastolo per l’omicidio di Giuseppe Matarazzo, il 45enne pastore di Frasso Telesino che il 19 luglio del 2018 venne ucciso a colpi di pistola a pochi passi alla sua abitazione. I due imputati erano in carcere dal 28 dicembre del 2018.

Given that one of the two under-age sisters later killed herself after the abuse by this pedo-priest of the fake “Catholic Church”, I too disagree vehemently with his having been shot to death. Most unfair. In my opinion the burning at the stake of pedophiles should immediately be reinstated as the correct punishment and carried out on such “priests” preferably in St. Peter’s Square, daily. There’s a lot of them to get through after all. Should I ever be voted into power in this country, I will do all I can to really pass this, so that we are all always following the law. We would not want to be criminals and do illegal things, no, no, we should make the killing of pedophiles not only a sacrosanct duty, but we should make sure it is all done legally, of course.

Civilisation demands we follow the rules after all. And if the rules are wrong, well, we should all endeavour to change them.

It is my very sincere hope that the utterly de-balled, feminised, trannified, “men” of the British Isles, find some testicle DNA and using the latest technology maybe exhume, extract and clone a pair from the corpse of a long-lost British ancestor that still had at least one functioning testicle, then re-grow them in clone-pairs, and start to graft them on to themselves and then begin to act accordingly.

Then again, this might not be possible. After all, I seem to recall even back in Roman times they had to get their women to lead them into battle. Not effectively, or successfully, since about 10,000 Romans ultimately defeated between 100,000 to 200,000 of these British “men”, but at least they had their arses painted blue before battle, possibly to hide the spanking they seem to revel in receiving by… well everyone.

So… that is why the West is not reproducing as much as it should, and the British “men” are really the primary example of this situation. They are all weak and whiny, which is why their women have historically always had to take charge or rely on some foreign men to act as men instead.

That, gentlemen, is your choice. Keep acting like weak cowards, or organise and reclaim your ancestral lands, culture and laws.